Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000016561]. Mailed to: Bradley Maxwell. [16-7352]
Appeal: 16-7352
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7352
BRADLEY MAXWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE; DAVID ROBINSON; TERRY GLENN; HENRY PONTON;
LESLIE FLEMING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Nancy Hull Davidson,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7352
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Maxwell
v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2016).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?