Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000016561]. Mailed to: Bradley Maxwell. [16-7352]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7352 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7352 BRADLEY MAXWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE; DAVID ROBINSON; TERRY GLENN; HENRY PONTON; LESLIE FLEMING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7352 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?