William Huggins v. Officer Roach
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03002-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000033199]. Mailed to: William Michael Huggins. [16-7382]
Appeal: 16-7382
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/01/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7382
WILLIAM MICHAEL HUGGINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER ROACH; DREW STANLEY; DENNIS ROWLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03002-BO)
Submitted:
February 23, 2017
Decided:
March 1, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Michael Huggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Finarelli,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7382
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/01/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William Michael Huggins appeals the district court’s order
and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing
Huggins’ civil rights complaint.
find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Huggins v. Roach, No. 5:15-ct-
03002-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?