William Huggins v. Officer Roach


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03002-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000033199]. Mailed to: William Michael Huggins. [16-7382]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7382 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/01/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7382 WILLIAM MICHAEL HUGGINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER ROACH; DREW STANLEY; DENNIS ROWLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03002-BO) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: March 1, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Michael Huggins, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7382 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/01/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William Michael Huggins appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing Huggins’ civil rights complaint. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huggins v. Roach, No. 5:15-ct- 03002-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?