Elia Watkins v. John Cullen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01033-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000027772]. Mailed to: Elia Watkins. [16-7388]
Appeal: 16-7388
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/22/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7388
ELIA T. WATKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN CULLEN, CEO; SHERRI PASSERELL, Psychiatrist; LAUREN
LYONS, Psychologist; LEE CASHDOLLAR, Social Worker; DAN BROWN,
Social Worker; RICHARD MIHAILOVICH, R.N.; LAURA ROBINSON, Rec.
Therapist; TERRI EMERSON, Rec. Therapist; JANET HENDERSHOT,
F.R.B. Psycholo.; MARY-LOU PERKINS, F.R.B. Social Wk.; SHARON
PENCE, R.N.; JOSEPH LYDEN, C.N.A.; GARY LEASURE, Allegany Co.
Circuit Court Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge.
(1:16-cv-01033-JFM)
Submitted:
February 16, 2017
Decided:
February 22, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elia T. Watkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7388
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/22/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Elia T. Watkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order
warning him that his complaint is subject to dismissal without
prejudice.
We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because
the order Watkins seeks to appeal is neither final nor otherwise
appealable.
See Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541, 545-47 (1949); Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233-34
(1945).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?