Supreme Raheem Ackbar v. Lieutenant McPherson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-02246-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000038969]. Mailed to: Ackbar. [16-7391]
Appeal: 16-7391
Doc: 22
Filed: 03/09/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7391
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT MCPHERSON; SERGEANT BOGERSRODE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MICHAEL MCCALL; SERGEANT BOGASTROKE; OFFICER MCCANTS;
CAPTAIN STONEBREAKER; RAMMARINE JAGLAL, Lieber CI Dentist;
GWENDOLYN T. STOKES, Registered Nurse at Lee Correctional
Institution; WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Commissioner of The
South Carolina Department of Corrections Commissioner,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-02246-RMG)
Submitted:
February 27, 2017
Decided:
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
March 9, 2017
Appeal: 16-7391
Doc: 22
Filed: 03/09/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Leigh Powers
David J. Mills, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Pawleys Island,
Carolina, for Appellees.
Boan,
South
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-7391
Doc: 22
Filed: 03/09/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order
entering judgment in favor of defendants following a bench trial
on Ackbar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
We have reviewed
the record and Ackbar’s claims and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Ackbar
v.
Sept. 12, 2016).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
McPherson,
No.
2:14-cv-02246-RMG
(D.S.C.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?