Supreme Raheem Ackbar v. Lieutenant McPherson


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-02246-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000038969]. Mailed to: Ackbar. [16-7391]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7391 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/09/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7391 SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT MCPHERSON; SERGEANT BOGERSRODE, Defendants – Appellees, and MICHAEL MCCALL; SERGEANT BOGASTROKE; OFFICER MCCANTS; CAPTAIN STONEBREAKER; RAMMARINE JAGLAL, Lieber CI Dentist; GWENDOLYN T. STOKES, Registered Nurse at Lee Correctional Institution; WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Commissioner of The South Carolina Department of Corrections Commissioner, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (2:14-cv-02246-RMG) Submitted: February 27, 2017 Decided: Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. March 9, 2017 Appeal: 16-7391 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/09/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Leigh Powers David J. Mills, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Pawleys Island, Carolina, for Appellees. Boan, South Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-7391 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/09/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of defendants following a bench trial on Ackbar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and Ackbar’s claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. Sept. 12, 2016). facts and materials legal before McPherson, No. 2:14-cv-02246-RMG (D.S.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?