Michael Loiseau v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999964926-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000038929]. Mailed to: M Loiseau. [16-7395]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7395 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/09/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7395 MICHAEL ANGELO LOISEAU, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY) Submitted: February 27, 2017 Decided: March 9, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Angelo Loiseau, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7395 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/09/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Angelo Loiseau appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Loiseau’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, court. (E.D. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible we affirm for the reasons stated by the district See Loiseau v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY Va. Sept. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?