Michael Loiseau v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999964926-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000038929]. Mailed to: M Loiseau. [16-7395]
Appeal: 16-7395
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/09/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7395
MICHAEL ANGELO LOISEAU,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY)
Submitted:
February 27, 2017
Decided:
March 9, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Angelo Loiseau, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7395
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/09/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Angelo Loiseau appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice Loiseau’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition.
error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis,
court.
(E.D.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
See Loiseau v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY
Va.
Sept.
16,
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?