Anthony Kelly v. Frank Bishop

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000005644-2]; denying Motion to participate in oral argument [999970258-2], denying Motion to participate in oral argument [999964947-2], denying Motion to participate in oral argument [999964942-2]; denying Motion to reconsider [999970229-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03795-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000030206]. Mailed to: Anthony Kelly. [16-7399]

Appeal: 16-7399

Doc: 31

Filed: 02/24/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7399

ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-03795-RDB)

Submitted:

February 17, 2017

Decided:

February 24, 2017

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7399

Doc: 31

Filed: 02/24/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to
state

a

claim.

We

reversible error.

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
(D. Md. Sept. 27, 2016).

Kelly v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-03795-RDB
We deny Kelly’s motions to participate

in oral argument, to reconsider, and to appoint counsel.
dispense

with

contentions

are

no

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2