Anthony Kelly v. Frank Bishop
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000005644-2]; denying Motion to participate in oral argument [999970258-2], denying Motion to participate in oral argument [999964947-2], denying Motion to participate in oral argument [999964942-2]; denying Motion to reconsider [999970229-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03795-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Anthony Kelly. [16-7399]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
February 17, 2017
February 24, 2017
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
(D. Md. Sept. 27, 2016).
Kelly v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-03795-RDB
We deny Kelly’s motions to participate
in oral argument, to reconsider, and to appoint counsel.
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?