McKindley Travis v. Patricia Watson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999958508-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01006-TSE-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000028060]. Mailed to: McKindley Travis. [16-7400]
Appeal: 16-7400
Doc: 16
Filed: 02/22/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7400
MCKINDLEY TRAVIS,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA WATSON,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
NELSON H. C. FISHER,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01006-TSE-IDD)
Submitted:
February 16, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge,
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Decided:
DUNCAN,
February 22, 2017
Circuit
Judge,
and
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
McKindley Travis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7400
Doc: 16
Filed: 02/22/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
McKindley Travis seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion for appointment of counsel.
This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus.
Loan
Travis
seeks
Corp.,
to
337
appeal
U.S.
is
541,
545-46
neither
a
(1949).
final
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
The
order
order
nor
an
Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal
for
lack
of
jurisdiction.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?