US v. Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cr-00039-MBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016746]. Mailed to: Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez GREAT PLAINS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 400 Hinton, OK 73047-0000. [16-7406]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7406 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7406 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAURICIO HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cr-00039-MBS-1) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7406 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mauricio appeal the Government’s opposition to a motion in his criminal case. This court may Hernandez-Martinez exercise seeks jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. and only to over certain § 1292 final orders, interlocutory (2012); Fed. R. Civ. and P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). Hernandez-Martinez does not appeal from an order of the district court. of jurisdiction. facts and materials legal before Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?