US v. Darryl Riley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016630]. Mailed to: D Riley. [16-7408]

Appeal: 16-7408

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7408

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL GLEN RILEY, a/k/a Kendu,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1)

Submitted:

January 31, 2017

Decided:

February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Glen Riley, Appellant Pro Se.
Heather Hart Mansfield,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7408

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Darryl
denying

Glen

his

18

Riley

U.S.C.

appeals
§

the

3582(c)(2)

district
(2012)

court’s

motion.

order

We

have

reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not
abuse its
States

discretion

in

denying

Smalls,

720

F.3d

v.

Accordingly,
States

v.

2016).
legal
before

we

affirm

Riley,

No.

the

Riley’s
193,

district

motion.

195

(4th

court’s

3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1

See
Cir.

order.

(E.D.

Va.

United
2013).
United

Sept. 28,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2