US v. Darryl Riley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016630]. Mailed to: D Riley. [16-7408]
Appeal: 16-7408
Doc: 5
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7408
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL GLEN RILEY, a/k/a Kendu,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Glen Riley, Appellant Pro Se.
Heather Hart Mansfield,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7408
Doc: 5
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl
denying
Glen
his
18
Riley
U.S.C.
appeals
§
the
3582(c)(2)
district
(2012)
court’s
motion.
order
We
have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not
abuse its
States
discretion
in
denying
Smalls,
720
F.3d
v.
Accordingly,
States
v.
2016).
legal
before
we
affirm
Riley,
No.
the
Riley’s
193,
district
motion.
195
(4th
court’s
3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1
See
Cir.
order.
(E.D.
Va.
United
2013).
United
Sept. 28,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?