US v. Darryl Riley


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016630]. Mailed to: D Riley. [16-7408]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7408 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7408 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARRYL GLEN RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl Glen Riley, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7408 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Darryl denying Glen his 18 Riley U.S.C. appeals § the 3582(c)(2) district (2012) court’s motion. order We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its States discretion in denying Smalls, 720 F.3d v. Accordingly, States v. 2016). legal before we affirm Riley, No. the Riley’s 193, district motion. 195 (4th court’s 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 See Cir. order. (E.D. Va. United 2013). United Sept. 28, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?