Travis Eugene Ward v. Barbara Meade
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00657-REP-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000030134]. Mailed to: Ward. [16-7421]
Appeal: 16-7421
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/24/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7421
TRAVIS EUGENE WARD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BARBARA MEADE, Medical Administrator; BRITTNEY BLACKSHEAR,
Substance Abuse Counselor; C. STEVENSON, Ombudsman,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:16-cv-00657-REP-RCY)
Submitted:
January 20, 2017
Decided:
February 24, 2017
Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Eugene Ward, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7421
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/24/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Travis
dismissing
Eugene
his
42
Ward
appeals
U.S.C.
the
§ 1983
district
(2012)
court’s
complaint
without
prejudice for failure to comply with a court order.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
order
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ward v.
Meade, No. 3:16-cv-00657-REP-RCY (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2016).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?