Travis Eugene Ward v. Barbara Meade


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00657-REP-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000030134]. Mailed to: Ward. [16-7421]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7421 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7421 TRAVIS EUGENE WARD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BARBARA MEADE, Medical Administrator; BRITTNEY BLACKSHEAR, Substance Abuse Counselor; C. STEVENSON, Ombudsman, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00657-REP-RCY) Submitted: January 20, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017 Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Travis Eugene Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7421 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Travis dismissing Eugene his 42 Ward appeals U.S.C. the § 1983 district (2012) court’s complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. order We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Meade, No. 3:16-cv-00657-REP-RCY (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2016). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?