Somchai Noonsab v. USDC EDNC


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03112-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032227]. [16-7430]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7430 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7430 SOMCHAI NOONSAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA; W. T. BROWN; STEPHEN RUSSELL; MELANIE SHEKITA; PAUL GESSNER; MICHAEL HOWELL; KINDRA AILEEN; DETECTIVE CHAN; PAUL C. RIDGEWAY; DANIEL HORN, JR.; CHRISTINA CAMERON ROEDEO; JOSH STEIN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03112-FL) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Somchai Noonsab, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7430 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Somchai Noonsab appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and denying his motion for reconsideration. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Noonsab v. U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of N.C., No. 5:16-ct-03112-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2016 & Oct. 13, 2016). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?