Somchai Noonsab v. USDC EDNC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03112-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032227]. [16-7430]

Appeal: 16-7430

Doc: 20

Filed: 02/28/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7430

SOMCHAI NOONSAB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA; W. T. BROWN; STEPHEN RUSSELL; MELANIE
SHEKITA; PAUL GESSNER; MICHAEL HOWELL; KINDRA AILEEN;
DETECTIVE CHAN; PAUL C. RIDGEWAY; DANIEL HORN, JR.;
CHRISTINA CAMERON ROEDEO; JOSH STEIN,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:16-ct-03112-FL)

Submitted:

February 23, 2017

Decided:

February 28, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Somchai Noonsab, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7430

Doc: 20

Filed: 02/28/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Somchai

Noonsab

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and denying his motion
for reconsideration.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Noonsab v. U.S. Dist. Court for the E.

Dist. of N.C., No. 5:16-ct-03112-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2016 &
Oct. 13, 2016).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2