Winchaus Hayes v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00532-RAJ-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Winchaus Angelo Hayes. [16-7435]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff – Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden; CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Director, FBOP;
(MR.) LAWSON, Supervisor,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
December 15, 2016
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Winchaus Angelo Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van
Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Winchaus Angelo Hayes appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint.
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Hayes v. United States,
No. 2:14-cv-00532-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2016).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?