Charles Cooper v. Harold W. Clarke
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999966546-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01247-JCC-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032116]. Mailed to: Charles Cooper DEERFIELD CORRECTIONAL CENTER 21360 Deerfield Drive Capron, VA 23829-0000. [16-7454]
Appeal: 16-7454
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/28/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7454
CHARLES COOPER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corr., et
al.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:16-cv-01247-JCC-JFA)
Submitted:
February 23, 2017
Decided:
February 28, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7454
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/28/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Charles
Cooper
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized
successive
28
U.S.C.
our
brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
not
to
challenge
disposition,
Cooper
court’s order.
the
(2012)
confine
does
review
§ 2254
the
has
issues
petition.
raised
On
in
the
appeal,
we
Appellant’s
Because Cooper’s informal brief
basis
for
forfeited
the
district
appellate
review
court’s
of
the
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423,
430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, although we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s
judgment.
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?