Charles Cooper v. Harold W. Clarke


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999966546-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01247-JCC-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032116]. Mailed to: Charles Cooper DEERFIELD CORRECTIONAL CENTER 21360 Deerfield Drive Capron, VA 23829-0000. [16-7454]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7454 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7454 CHARLES COOPER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corr., et al., Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01247-JCC-JFA) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7454 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Charles Cooper appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. our brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). not to challenge disposition, Cooper court’s order. the (2012) confine does review § 2254 the has issues petition. raised On in the appeal, we Appellant’s Because Cooper’s informal brief basis for forfeited the district appellate review court’s of the See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?