Stacy W. Pringle v. Joseph McFadden
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999983968-2] Originating case number: 5:15-cv-01571-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Stacy W. Pringle LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472-0000. [16-7456]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
STACY W. PRINGLE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (5:15-cv-01571-JFA)
March 24, 2017
April 3, 2017
Before DUNCAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy W. Pringle, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant
Attorney General, Columbia, South Columbia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Stacy W. Pringle seeks to appeal the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.
certificate of appealability.
The order is
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012).
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
When the district court denies
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Slack, 529 U.S.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Pringle has not made the requisite showing.
deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
Pg: 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?