Juan Contreras v. Charles Ratledge
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999983053-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02014-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000154696]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-7500]
Appeal: 16-7500
Doc: 14
Filed: 09/13/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7500
JUAN ANTONIO CONTRERAS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES RATLEDGE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-hc-02014-D)
Submitted: August 31, 2017
Decided: September 13, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Antonio Contreras, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Seth Morgan Wood,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7500
Doc: 14
Filed: 09/13/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Juan Antonio Contreras, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Contreras v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc02014-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?