Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr. v. Officer D.R. Faulkner
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032110]. Mailed to: Allen Lee Godfrey Sr. RIVER NORTH CORRECTIONAL CENTER 329 Dell Brook Lane Independence, VA 24348. [16-7503]
Appeal: 16-7503
Doc: 13
Filed: 02/28/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7503
ALLEN LEE GODFREY, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER D. R. FAULKNER, RCPD; OFFICER MCNIFF, RCPD; OFFICER
COLLINS; OFFICER JOHN (2) DOE, RCPD; LT. RATLIFF, Roanoke
City Police Officer; OFFICER JOHN (3) DOE, RCPD; OFFICER
JOHN (4) DOE, RCPD; OFFICER JANE DOE, RCPD; SGT. I. T.
ANDERSON, RCPD; ALL OF THE ROANOKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT;
CHIEF JOE GASKINS, RCPD; CHIEF CHRIS PERKINS; OFFICER
LOUREIRO, a/k/a Loverio, RCPD,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB)
Submitted:
February 23, 2017
Decided:
February 28, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7503
Doc: 13
Filed: 02/28/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion filed in his closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) action for a transcript at Government expense.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
Godfrey v.
Oct. 21,
facts
the
reasons
Faulkner,
2016).
and
materials
for
legal
before
We
No.
stated
by
the
dispense
with
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
Accordingly,
district
7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB
court.
(W.D.
Va.
because
the
presented
would
We have
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?