Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr. v. Officer D.R. Faulkner


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032110]. Mailed to: Allen Lee Godfrey Sr. RIVER NORTH CORRECTIONAL CENTER 329 Dell Brook Lane Independence, VA 24348. [16-7503]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7503 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7503 ALLEN LEE GODFREY, SR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OFFICER D. R. FAULKNER, RCPD; OFFICER MCNIFF, RCPD; OFFICER COLLINS; OFFICER JOHN (2) DOE, RCPD; LT. RATLIFF, Roanoke City Police Officer; OFFICER JOHN (3) DOE, RCPD; OFFICER JOHN (4) DOE, RCPD; OFFICER JANE DOE, RCPD; SGT. I. T. ANDERSON, RCPD; ALL OF THE ROANOKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF JOE GASKINS, RCPD; CHIEF CHRIS PERKINS; OFFICER LOUREIRO, a/k/a Loverio, RCPD, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7503 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed in his closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for a transcript at Government expense. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm Godfrey v. Oct. 21, facts the reasons Faulkner, 2016). and materials for legal before We No. stated by the dispense with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court Accordingly, district 7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB court. (W.D. Va. because the presented would We have not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?