US v. Jermaine Ro
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cr-00263-RJC-14 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Jermaine Ross. [16-7507]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
JERMAINE ANTONIO ROSS, a/k/a Rock,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (3:13-cr-00263-RJC-14)
February 16, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge,
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
February 22, 2017
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermaine Antonio Ross, Appellant Pro Se. William Michael Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Because Ross has no pending § 2255 motion, and
he may adequately raise his ineffective assistance of counsel
transcripts, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
files a § 2255 motion, the district court may then consider
whether an answer is required and whether transcript preparation
or some other form of discovery is necessary to decide Ross’
See Rule 4(b), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings
answer is required); Rule 5(c) (providing that court may order
government to furnish transcripts); Rule 6(a) (allowing district
court to authorize discovery for good cause).
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?