US v. Santonio Minu
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Certificate of appealability denied. Originating case number: 5:12-cr-00014-MFU-RSB-5, 5:15-cv-80802-MFU-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Santonio Lenord Minus. [16-7511]
Pg: 1 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
SANTONIO LENORD MINUS, a/k/a Cheese, a/k/a Baldhead, a/k/a
B.G., a/k/a Santonio Minus,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Michael F. Urbanski,
March 30, 2017
April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Santonio Lenord Minus, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia; Grayson A.
Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Harrisonburg, Virginia; Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United
States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia; Craig Jon Jacobsen,
Pg: 2 of 4
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 4
Santonio Lenord Minus seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
When the district court denies
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Slack, 529 U.S.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Minus has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny
Pg: 4 of 4
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?