Gene Washington v. J. Mooney


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [1000052402-2] Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00514-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000083169]. Mailed to: Gene Washington. [16-7529]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7529 Doc: 22 Filed: 05/17/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7529 GENE EVERETTE WASHINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. P. MOONEY, Ch’ville PD; S. A. CASON, Det.; WOODZELL, Det.; LEZELLE DUGGAR, a/k/a Llezelle Dugger, Clerk; TIMOTHY LONGO, Chville PD Chief, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00514-JLK-RSB) Submitted: May 4, 2017 Decided: May 17, 2017 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gene Everette Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor, TAYLOR ZUNKA MILNOR & CARTER LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia; John Chadwick Johnson, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7529 Doc: 22 Filed: 05/17/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gene Everette Washington appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to state a claim and denying his subsequent motions to reopen and to continue. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Mooney, No. 7:15-cv-00514-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2016; Oct. 20, 2016). We further deny Washington’s motion to suppress seized evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?