US v. Lewis Cornell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:00-cr-00204-CCE-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000027972]. Mailed to: Lewis Cornell. [16-7532]

Appeal: 16-7532

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7532

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LEWIS THOMAS CORNELL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:00-cr-00204-CCE-3)

Submitted:

February 16, 2017

Decided:

February 22, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lewis Thomas Cornell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,
Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7532

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lewis Thomas Cornell appeals from the district court’s order
denying

his

motion

for

reconsideration

of

the

court’s

order

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of
his

sentence

based

Guidelines Manual.
reversible error.
order.

on

an

amendment

to

the

U.S.

Sentencing

We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir.

2010) (a district court has no authority to reconsider its decision
on a sentence reduction motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)).

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2