Gregory Leon Hammer v. Sheriff Bryan Hutcheson
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999976012-2] Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00499-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Gregory Leon Hammer ROCKINGHAM-HARRISONBURG REGIONAL JAIL 25 South Liberty Street Harrisonburg, VA 22801-3714. [16-7579]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY LEON HAMMER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
SHERIFF BRYAN HUTCHESON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:16-cv-00499-JLK-RSB)
March 30, 2017
April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Leon Hammer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Gregory Leon Hammer, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
The order is not appealable unless a circuit
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012).
A certificate of appealability
will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional
claims is debatable or wrong.
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,
When the district court denies relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a
debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
529 U.S. at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Hammer has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
Pg: 3 of 3
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?