Edwin Miller v. Harold Clarke


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00978-AJT-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032182]. Mailed to: E Miller. [16-7587]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7587 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7587 EDWIN MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia D.O.C.; KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden Sussex I State Prison; J. BOONE, Assistant Warden; CURRY, Lt.; Lieutenant Supervisor; RICKS, Sgt.; Sergeant Supervisor; C. W. COOK, Correctional Officer; J. E. SAUCEDO, Correctional Officer; CLINTON, O.S.S.; Office Service Specialist; WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator; OFFICER STEPHENSON, a/k/a Stevens, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00978-AJT-JFA) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwin Miller, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7587 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Edwin Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing the claims against Defendant Cook without prejudice and granting summary judgment to the remaining Defendants. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Clarke, No. 1:14-cv-00978-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2016; entered Oct. 28, 2016). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?