Edwin Miller v. Harold Clarke
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00978-AJT-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032182]. Mailed to: E Miller. [16-7587]
Appeal: 16-7587
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/28/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7587
EDWIN MILLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia D.O.C.; KEITH W. DAVIS,
Warden Sussex I State Prison; J. BOONE, Assistant Warden;
CURRY, Lt.; Lieutenant Supervisor; RICKS, Sgt.; Sergeant
Supervisor; C. W. COOK, Correctional Officer; J. E. SAUCEDO,
Correctional
Officer;
CLINTON,
O.S.S.;
Office
Service
Specialist; WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator; OFFICER
STEPHENSON, a/k/a Stevens,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00978-AJT-JFA)
Submitted:
February 23, 2017
Decided:
February 28, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Miller, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7587
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/28/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Edwin Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing
the claims against Defendant Cook without prejudice and granting
summary judgment to the remaining Defendants.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Miller v. Clarke,
No. 1:14-cv-00978-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2016; entered
Oct. 28, 2016).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?