Roderick English v. Warden, Broad River
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [1000005673-2], denying Motion for other relief [1000005672-2], denying Motion for other relief [1000004619-2], denying Motion for other relief [1000004613-2], denying Motion for other relief [1000002086-2], denying Motion for other relief [999989798-2], denying Motion for other relief [999989794-2], denying Motion for other relief [999989781-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct [1000005652-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [1000002101-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [999989776-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999994844-2], denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999989763-2]; denying Motion to expedite decision [999989797-2]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999989769-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00127-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: appellant. [16-7601]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Petitioner – Appellant,
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00127-JFA)
January 17, 2017
January 20, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
The district court referred this case to a magistrate
magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised
recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court
order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving
appealability, deny English’s pending motions, and dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?