Larry Rambert v. Heather Rose

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03316-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000098673]. Mailed to: Larry Felentise Rambert. [16-7614]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7614 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/12/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7614 LARRY FELENTISE RAMBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HEATHER ROSE; CITY OF JACKSONVILLE; JACKSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN ERVIN; DETECTIVE JORDAN; JEFF COVINGTON; CRYSTAL CATON; CHRIS COX; SERGEANT CAPPS; JOSEPH COOPER; SHELLY PARTIAN; K. L. DOYLE; RONNIE DORN; DALE SILANCE; RICHARD KELLUM; H. T. RANEY; TIMOTHY OSWALT, Attorney; SAMUEL S. POPKIN; FRANK L. PERRY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03316-BO) Submitted: May 31, 2017 Decided: June 12, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Felentise Rambert, Appellant Pro Se. Appeal: 16-7614 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/12/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-7614 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/12/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Larry Felentise Rambert appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rambert v. Rose, No. 5:15-ct-03316-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?