Brandon Pickens v. Kieran Shanahan
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00251-LCB-JLW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000044110]. Mailed to: Brandon Michael Pickens. [16-7647]
Appeal: 16-7647
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/17/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7647
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN, Secretary of the Department of Public
Safety; W. DAVID GUICE, Chief Deputy Secretary of the
Department of Public Safety; ROBERT C. LEWIS; INA HILTON;
SCOTLAND COUNTY; SORRELL SAUNDERS, Superintendent; N.C.
PRISON LEGAL SERVICES; ELIZABETH ALBITSON, Staff Attorney;
BEN FINHOLT, Staff Attorney; TIMOTHY REYNOLDS, Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
Loretta Copeland
Biggs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00251-LCB-JLW)
Submitted:
March 14, 2017
Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
March 17, 2017
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Michael Pickens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7647
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/17/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Michael Pickens appeals the district court’s order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2012).
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
See Pickens v. Shanahan, No. 1:16-cv-
00251-LCB-JLW (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?