Lonnelle Langley v. Unknown
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999991391-2]; denying Motion to add party [999994584-2], denying Motion to add party [1000017871-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00599-AWA-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000027915]. Mailed to: Lonnelle Langley. [16-7669]
Appeal: 16-7669
Doc: 20
Filed: 02/22/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7669
LONNELLE ANTWON LANGLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:16-cv-00599-AWA-DEM)
Submitted:
February 16, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge,
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Decided:
DUNCAN,
February 22, 2017
Circuit
Judge,
and
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lonnelle Antwon Langley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7669
Doc: 20
Filed: 02/22/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lonnelle Antwon Langley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2012).
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Langley v. Unknown, No. 2:16-cv-00599-
AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2016).
We deny Langley’s pending
motions, including his motions for a transcript at Government
expense,
to
add
party
names
of
defendants and to add parties.
the
unknown
district
court
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?