Lonnelle Langley v. Unknown


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999991391-2]; denying Motion to add party [999994584-2], denying Motion to add party [1000017871-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00599-AWA-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000027915]. Mailed to: Lonnelle Langley. [16-7669]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7669 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7669 LONNELLE ANTWON LANGLEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00599-AWA-DEM) Submitted: February 16, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Decided: DUNCAN, February 22, 2017 Circuit Judge, and Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lonnelle Antwon Langley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7669 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lonnelle Antwon Langley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Langley v. Unknown, No. 2:16-cv-00599- AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2016). We deny Langley’s pending motions, including his motions for a transcript at Government expense, to add party names of defendants and to add parties. the unknown district court We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?