US v. Wyaketta Welch
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency . Mailed to: Wyaketta Latoya Welch. [16-7670]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
WYAKETTA LATOYA WELCH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2)
March 30, 2017
April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wyaketta Latoya Welch, Appellant Pro Se.
Alyssa Kate Nichol,
Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Wyaketta Latoya Welch appeals the district court’s order
denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of
See United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437
(4th Cir. 2016) (providing standard).
Under § 3582(c)(2), the
sentenced . . . based
range that has subsequently been lowered,” if the amendment is
listed in the Guidelines as retroactively applicable.
§ 1B1.10(a)(1), (d), p.s. (2016).
Guidelines § 1B1.10(d), p.s.,
lists the amendments that receive retroactive application, and
this list does not include Amendment 794.
The district court
relief she sought under Amendment 794.
See United States v.
Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 249 n.2 (4th Cir. 2009); United States v.
McHan, 386 F.3d 620, 622 (4th Cir. 2004).
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?