US v. Monica Renteria-Gonzalez
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:12-cr-00037-FA-11 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-7695]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
David A. Faber,
Senior District Judge. (7:12-cr-00037-FA-11)
March 14, 2017
Before FLOYD and
March 17, 2017
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monica Renteria-Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Fritz,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or
§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012).
A certificate of appealability will not
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional
claims is debatable or wrong.
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,
When the district court denies relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a
debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
529 U.S. at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
Pg: 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?