US v. Ricardo Arce

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:08-cr-00111-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000064401]. Mailed to: Ricardo Arce. [16-7704]

Appeal: 16-7704

Doc: 7

Filed: 04/19/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7704

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICARDO ARCE,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-cr-00111-BO-1)

Submitted: April 5, 2017

Decided: April 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo Arce, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7704

Doc: 7

Filed: 04/19/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ricardo Arce appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Arce, No. 5:08-cr-00111-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 23, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2