William Davis, II v. State of N.C.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000022928-2]; denying Motion to remand case [1000042573-2]; denying Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [1000045516-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00549-MSD-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000055426]. Mailed to: W. Davis. [16-7706]
Appeal: 16-7706
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/04/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7706
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF N.C.; COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCE; HAMPTON
ROADS MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES; CITY OF HAMPTON; HONNELY
DSS-CPS WCHS-CPS; MIKE EASLY, NC Governor; BEVERLY PARDIC,
NC Governor; PAT MCCORY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:16-cv-00549-MSD-DEM)
Submitted:
March 30, 2017
Decided:
April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7706
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/04/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, II, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a claim
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012).
find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, deny Davis’ motions to remand and to dismiss
for lack of jurisdiction, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Davis v. North Carolina, No.
2:16−cv−00549−MSD−DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?