US v. David Hick

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:05-cr-00040-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000121932]. Mailed to: David A. Hicks. [16-7717]

Appeal: 16-7717

Doc: 7

Filed: 07/20/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7717

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID A. HICKS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00040-1)

Submitted: July 14, 2017

Decided: July 20, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Steven Loew, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Betty Adkins Pullin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7717

Doc: 7

Filed: 07/20/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David A. Hicks appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s
motion to destroy evidence. The motion was granted in accordance with the district
court’s local rules, and Hicks offers no evidence to support his claim that the exhibits
support a claim of actual innocence.

Accordingly, we affirm the grant of the

Government’s motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2