Monique Weldon v. Lori Nohe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-03815 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000055248]. Mailed to: Monique Nicole Weldon LAKIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER 11264 Ohio River Road West Columbia, WV 25287, Stacy L. Nowicki-Eldridge, Cynthia Gardner. [16-7721]
Appeal: 16-7721
Doc: 16
Filed: 04/04/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7721
MONIQUE NICOLE WELDON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORI NOHE, Warden; JOE WOOD, Associate Warden of Security; JIM
RUBENSTEIN, Commission, WVDOC; C. J. RIDER, Director of Inmate Services,
WVDOC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-03815)
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monique Nicole Weldon, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Gardner, Stacy L. Nowicki-Eldridge,
WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7721
Doc: 16
Filed: 04/04/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Monique Nicole Weldon appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weldon v. Nohe, No. 3:16-cv-03815
(S.D. W. Va. Dec. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?