Monique Weldon v. Lori Nohe


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-03815 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000055248]. Mailed to: Monique Nicole Weldon LAKIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER 11264 Ohio River Road West Columbia, WV 25287, Stacy L. Nowicki-Eldridge, Cynthia Gardner. [16-7721]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7721 Doc: 16 Filed: 04/04/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7721 MONIQUE NICOLE WELDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LORI NOHE, Warden; JOE WOOD, Associate Warden of Security; JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commission, WVDOC; C. J. RIDER, Director of Inmate Services, WVDOC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-03815) Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monique Nicole Weldon, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Gardner, Stacy L. Nowicki-Eldridge, WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7721 Doc: 16 Filed: 04/04/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Monique Nicole Weldon appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weldon v. Nohe, No. 3:16-cv-03815 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?