Kenneth Bond v. Lt. Clark
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000048581-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00138-TSE-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: K Bond. [16-7770]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
LT. CLARK, Lt. grcc; O’DONNELL, c/o grcc; C/O MILLS, c/o grcc,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00138-TSE-MSN)
Submitted: May 30, 2017
Decided: June 6, 2017
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Kenneth Bond appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment on
his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), dismissing his complaint, and denying his
request for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bond v. Clark, No.
1:16-cv-00138-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 10, 2016 & entered Nov. 11, 2016; Dec.
14, 2016). We deny Bond’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?