US v. Kunta Redd

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032013]. Mailed to: Kunta Redd. [16-7771]

Appeal: 16-7771

Doc: 10

Filed: 02/28/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7771

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KUNTA KENTA REDD,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (7:08-cr-00043-D-1)

Submitted:

February 23, 2017

Decided:

February 28, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kunta Kenta Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Scott
Andrew Lemmon, Timothy Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7771

Doc: 10

Filed: 02/28/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kunta Kenta Redd appeals the district court’s order denying
his

18

U.S.C.

sentence,
privacy

§ 3582(c)(2)

denying

his

seal.

protection,

(2012)

motions

and

for

granting

motion
leave

the

for
to

reduction

appeal

Government’s

of

and

for

motion

to

Redd confines his relevant arguments on appeal to the

district

court’s

denial

of

§ 3582(c)(2)

relief.

We

have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error in this ruling.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Redd, No. 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 (E.D.N.C.

Nov. 14, 2016).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2