US v. Kunta Redd


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032013]. Mailed to: Kunta Redd. [16-7771]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7771 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7771 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KUNTA KENTA REDD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (7:08-cr-00043-D-1) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kunta Kenta Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Scott Andrew Lemmon, Timothy Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7771 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kunta Kenta Redd appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. sentence, privacy § 3582(c)(2) denying his seal. protection, (2012) motions and for granting motion leave the for to reduction appeal Government’s of and for motion to Redd confines his relevant arguments on appeal to the district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in this ruling. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Redd, No. 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2016). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?