Eric Streeter v. Walden University, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-03460-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087869]. Mailed to: Eric Streeter. [17-1004]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1004 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1004 ERIC D. STREETER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WALDEN UNIVERSITY, LLC; LAUREATE EDUCATION, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-03460-CCB) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric D. Streeter, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: May 25, 2017 Appeal: 17-1004 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Eric D. Streeter seeks to appeal a motion filed before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The filing Streeter seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. In addition, this court may review orders from the JPML only when petitioned by extraordinary writ, and then only in certain circumstances not present here. See 28 U.S.C. § 1407(e) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?