Julio Guarado Flores v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A094-752-224 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000131392].. [17-1016]
Appeal: 17-1016
Doc: 22
Filed: 08/04/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1016
JULIO GUARDADO FLORES,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: August 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John T. Riely, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Kohsei Ugumori, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jeffery R. Leist, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1016
Doc: 22
Filed: 08/04/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Julio Guardado Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of
an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the
immigration judge’s denial of his application for adjustment of status. Because the agency
denied relief in the exercise of its discretion, we lack jurisdiction over the petition for
review pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (2012). * Accordingly, we dismiss the
petition for review.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
*
We conclude that Guardado Flores fails to raise a colorable constitutional claim or
question of law that would fall within the exception set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D)
(2012).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?