William Brown, Jr. v. Tompkins Builders, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000053788-2]; denying Motion for an audience [1000094752-2]. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00599-REP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000105030]. Mailed to: B & M Hitech Electric, William Brown, Jr. [17-1025]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1025 Doc: 29 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1025 WILLIAM BROWN, JR.; B & M HITECH ELECTRIC, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. TOMPKINS BUILDERS, INC.; S. B. BALLARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; T. K. DAVIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; WATSON ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC; DAVID BROWN; DAVID COLLINS; RICHARD ALLARD, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00599-REP) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jaime Brett Wisegarver, HIRSCHLER FLEISCHER, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1025 Doc: 29 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William Brown, Jr., and B & M Hitech Electric appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the Plaintiffs’ motion for an audience and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Tompkins Builders, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00599-REP (E.D. Va., Dec. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?