In Re: Michael Gorbey
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000033867-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000000161-2]. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00455-JLK-RSB, 7:16-cv-00522-JLK-RSB,7:16-cv-00544-JLK-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Michael Gorbey. [17-1029]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(7:16-cv-00455-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00522-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00544-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 5, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Gorbey, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Michael S. Gorbey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has
unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions for reconsideration. He seeks
an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s dockets reveals that the district court entered orders on January 3, 2017, denying
the three motions identified in Gorbey’s petition. Accordingly, because the district court
has recently decided Gorbey’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?