Charles F. Stansbury, Jr. v. Hon. Stephen M. Waldron


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-03888-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000133663]. Mailed to: Charles Stansbury, Jr.. [17-1033]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1033 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/09/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1033 CHARLES F. STANSBURY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE STEPHEN M. WALDRON; HONORABLE YOLANDA L. CURTAIN; LISA HYLE MARTS; HONORABLE ANGELA M. EAVES; ERIC P. MACDONNELL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03888-GLR) Submitted: July 20, 2017 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles F. Stansbury, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: August 9, 2017 Appeal: 17-1033 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/09/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Charles F. Stansbury, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of Stansbury’s claim that Defendant Lisa Hyle Marts fabricated evidence because Stansbury failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007); see also Thomas v. Salvation Army S. Territory, 841 F.3d 632, 638 (4th Cir. 2016) (stating we may “affirm the district court on alternate grounds”). We affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims for the reasons stated by the district court. Stansbury v. Waldron, No. 1:16-cv-03888-GLR (D. Md. Dec. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?