William Byard, Jr. v. Honeywell International, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00755-ELH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000112767]. [17-1042]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1042 Doc: 36 Filed: 07/06/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1042 WILLIAM L. BYARD, JR., as Personal Representative and surviving son of the Estate of William Lee Byard; CARRIE L. BYARD, surviving daughter of William Lee Byard; ROBERT L. BYARD, surviving son of William Lee Byard, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00755-ELH) Submitted: June 27, 2017 Decided: July 6, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary J. Ignatowski, Jeffrey J. Utermohle, Patrick A. Ciociola, LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Michael D. Daneker, Eric A. Rey, ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1042 Doc: 36 Filed: 07/06/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William L. Byard, Jr., Carrie L. Byard, and Robert L. Byard appeal the district court’s order dismissing the complaint based on this court’s recent decision in Leichling v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc., 842 F.3d 848 (4th Cir. 2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Byard v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00755-ELH (D. Md. Dec. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?