William Byard, Jr. v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00755-ELH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000112767]. [17-1042]

Appeal: 17-1042

Doc: 36

Filed: 07/06/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1042

WILLIAM L. BYARD, JR., as Personal Representative and surviving son of the
Estate of William Lee Byard; CARRIE L. BYARD, surviving daughter of William
Lee Byard; ROBERT L. BYARD, surviving son of William Lee Byard,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00755-ELH)

Submitted: June 27, 2017

Decided: July 6, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary J. Ignatowski, Jeffrey J. Utermohle, Patrick A. Ciociola, LAW OFFICES OF
PETER G. ANGELOS, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Michael D. Daneker,
Eric A. Rey, ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1042

Doc: 36

Filed: 07/06/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William L. Byard, Jr., Carrie L. Byard, and Robert L. Byard appeal the district
court’s order dismissing the complaint based on this court’s recent decision in
Leichling v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc., 842 F.3d 848 (4th Cir. 2016). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Byard v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00755-ELH (D. Md. Dec. 13,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2