Mary Gibbs v. Dorchester County Education Bd


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00395-JMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000165315]. [17-1045]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1045 Doc: 33 Filed: 10/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1045 MARY WOOLFORD GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DORCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Mark Coulson, Magistrate Judge. (1:16-cv-00395-JMC) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robin R. Cockey, Ashley A. Bosché, COCKEY, BRENNAN & MALONEY, PC, Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellant. Lisa Y. Settles, Adam E. Konstas, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1045 Doc: 33 Filed: 10/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mary Woolford Gibbs appeals the magistrate judge’s * order granting summary judgment on her claim alleging that the Dorchester County Board of Education undercompensated her because of her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Gibbs v. Dorchester Cty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:16-cv-00395-JMC (D. Md. Jan. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2012). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?