Mary Gibbs v. Dorchester County Education Bd
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00395-JMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000165315]. [17-1045]
Appeal: 17-1045
Doc: 33
Filed: 10/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1045
MARY WOOLFORD GIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DORCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Mark Coulson, Magistrate Judge. (1:16-cv-00395-JMC)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robin R. Cockey, Ashley A. Bosché, COCKEY, BRENNAN & MALONEY, PC,
Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellant. Lisa Y. Settles, Adam E. Konstas, PESSIN KATZ
LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1045
Doc: 33
Filed: 10/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mary Woolford Gibbs appeals the magistrate judge’s * order granting summary
judgment on her claim alleging that the Dorchester County Board of Education
undercompensated her because of her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. See Gibbs v. Dorchester Cty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:16-cv-00395-JMC (D. Md. Jan.
6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636 (2012).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?