Douglas C. Charnock, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00493-RAJ-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000170923].. [17-1049]

Appeal: 17-1049

Doc: 49

Filed: 10/11/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1049

DOUGLAS C. CHARNOCK, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;
FREDERICK B. LOWE, JR.,

EDWARD

W.

HANSON,

JR.;

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00493-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: September 19, 2017

Decided: October 11, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg, LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL D.J. EISENBERG, Washington,
D.C., for Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General of Virginia, Samuel T. Towell,
Deputy Attorney General, Nicholas F. Simopoulos, Senior Assistant Attorney General,
Christian A. Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1049

Doc: 49

Filed: 10/11/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Douglas C. Charnock, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’
motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Charnock v. Virginia, No. 2:16-cv-00493-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

2