David J. Laux v. Board of Supervisor


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000114722]. Mailed to: David J. Laux 4613 Randolph Drive Annandale, VA 22003 Tara K. Laux 4613 Randolph Drive Annandale, VA 22003. [17-1051]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1051 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/10/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1051 DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W. PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: July 10, 2017 Before MOTZ, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David J. Laux, Tara K. Laux, Appellants Pro Se. Christopher Anthony Costa, Sara Grossman Silverman, Assistant County Attorneys, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1051 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/10/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laux v. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfax Cnty., No. 1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?