David J. Laux v. Board of Supervisor
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000114722]. Mailed to: David J. Laux 4613 Randolph Drive Annandale, VA 22003 Tara K. Laux 4613 Randolph Drive Annandale, VA 22003. [17-1051]
Appeal: 17-1051
Doc: 18
Filed: 07/10/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1051
DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W.
PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and
Environmental Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: July 10, 2017
Before MOTZ, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David J. Laux, Tara K. Laux, Appellants Pro Se. Christopher Anthony Costa, Sara
Grossman Silverman, Assistant County Attorneys, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1051
Doc: 18
Filed: 07/10/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s order dismissing their
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laux v. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfax
Cnty., No. 1:16-cv-01260-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?