Hesman Tall v. Maryland Developmental
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03811-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000090131]. Mailed to: Hesman Tall 10721 Graeloch Road Laurel, MD 20723. [17-1066]
Appeal: 17-1066
Doc: 5
Filed: 05/30/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1066
HESMAN TALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADMINISTRATION;
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03811-ELH)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Decided: May 30, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Jean Coleman, William G. Dunlap, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1066
Doc: 5
Filed: 05/30/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack
of jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). “We review a district court’s dismissal for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) de novo,” Demetres v. E. W.
Const., Inc., 776 F.3d 271, 272 (4th Cir. 2015), and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Tall v. Md.
Developmental Disabilities Admin., No. 1:15-cv-03811-ELH (D. Md. filed on Dec. 29,
2016 & entered Dec. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?