In re: Jamal Hosendove


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000005691-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000005690-2]. Originating case number: 7:12-cr-00093-H-1,7:16-cv-00118-H. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000055474]. Mailed to: Jamal Hosendove. [17-1072]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1072 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/04/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1072 In Re: JAMAL KWAME HOSENDOVE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:12-cr-00093-H-1; 7:16-cv-00118-H) Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal Kwame Hosendove, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1072 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/04/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jamal Kwame Hosendove petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?