In re: Jamal Hosendove
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000005691-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000005690-2]. Originating case number: 7:12-cr-00093-H-1,7:16-cv-00118-H. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000055474]. Mailed to: Jamal Hosendove. [17-1072]
Appeal: 17-1072
Doc: 5
Filed: 04/04/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1072
In Re: JAMAL KWAME HOSENDOVE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(7:12-cr-00093-H-1; 7:16-cv-00118-H)
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamal Kwame Hosendove, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1072
Doc: 5
Filed: 04/04/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jamal Kwame Hosendove petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion. He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present
record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?