Temesgen Abdissa v. Merck Corporate


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00393-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087209]. Mailed to: Temesgen Teshome Abdissa 6806 Horseback Lane Raleigh, NC 27610. [17-1079]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1079 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1079 TEMESGEN TESHOME ABDISSA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MERCK CORPORATE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-cv-00393-BO) Submitted: May 18, 2017 Decided: May 24, 2017 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Temesgen Teshome Abdissa, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Vincent Federmack, Ted N. Kazaglis, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1079 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Temesgen Teshome Abdissa appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdissa v. Merck Corporate, No. 5:15-cv-00393-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?