Mirna Rodriquez v. Eric Fanning
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. . [17-1083]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
ERIC K. FANNING, Secretary of the Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA)
Submitted: September 12, 2017
Decided: September 21, 2017
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Jenkins, Jr., BYNUM & JENKINS, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.
Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Kimere J. Kimball, Assistant United States
Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Mirna Rodriquez appeals the district court’s orders deeming the Appellee’s
statement of undisputed facts as admitted and denying reconsideration, and granting
summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Rodriquez’s claims of discrimination and
retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Rodriquez v. Fanning, No.
1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?