Mirna Rodriquez v. Eric Fanning

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000159386]. [17-1083]

Appeal: 17-1083

Doc: 37

Filed: 09/21/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1083

MIRNA RODRIQUEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. FANNING, Secretary of the Army,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: September 12, 2017

Decided: September 21, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Jenkins, Jr., BYNUM & JENKINS, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.
Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Kimere J. Kimball, Assistant United States
Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1083

Doc: 37

Filed: 09/21/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mirna Rodriquez appeals the district court’s orders deeming the Appellee’s
statement of undisputed facts as admitted and denying reconsideration, and granting
summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Rodriquez’s claims of discrimination and
retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Rodriquez v. Fanning, No.

1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2