Clarence Andrews, Jr. v. Ditech Mortgage Corp.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00631-JAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087937]. Mailed to: Clarence Andrews, Jr. [17-1088]

Appeal: 17-1088

Doc: 12

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1088

CLARENCE ANDREWS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DITECH MORTGAGE CORP.; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00631-JAG)

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Andrews, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan S. Hubbard, David Tony Long, Jr.,
Sarah Warren Smith, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1088

Doc: 12

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Clarence Andrews, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his
civil action for failure to comply with the court’s order directing him to amend his
complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Andrews’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Andrews has forfeited appellate review of the court’s
order.

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district
court’s judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2