Starsha M. Sewell, M.Ed. v. Westat


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-00158-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000083185]. Mailed to: Starsha M. Sewell P. O. Box 7073 Capitol Heights, MD 20791. [17-1105]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1105 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/17/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1105 STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.Ed., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WESTAT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-00158-RWT) Submitted: May 15, 2017 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: May 17, 2017 Appeal: 17-1105 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/17/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying relief in this action alleging employment discrimination and denying several postjudgment motions. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sewell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sewell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?