Starsha M. Sewell, M.Ed. v. Strayer University
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-00159-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Starsha M. Sewell P. O. Box 7073 Capitol Heights, MD 20791. [17-1107]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.Ed.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
STRAYER UNIVERSITY; ROBERT SILBERMAN; KARL MCDONNELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:16-cv-00159-PWG)
Submitted: May 9, 2017
Decided: May 17, 2017
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, OGLETREE DEAKINS
NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s order dismissing this employment
discrimination action and imposing a prefiling injunction. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
Sewell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Sewell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food
Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?