Starsha M. Sewell, M.Ed. v. Strayer University

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-00159-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000083189]. Mailed to: Starsha M. Sewell P. O. Box 7073 Capitol Heights, MD 20791. [17-1107]

Appeal: 17-1107

Doc: 17

Filed: 05/17/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1107

STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.Ed.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STRAYER UNIVERSITY; ROBERT SILBERMAN; KARL MCDONNELL,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:16-cv-00159-PWG)

Submitted: May 9, 2017

Decided: May 17, 2017

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, OGLETREE DEAKINS
NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1107

Doc: 17

Filed: 05/17/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s order dismissing this employment
discrimination action and imposing a prefiling injunction. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
Sewell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Sewell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food
Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2